T600 vs FirePro W7000

#ad 
Buy
FirePro D300 FirePro R5000 FirePro S7000 FirePro W4000 FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000 DVI FirePro W7000 Radeon Sky 500
VS
#ad 
Buy
Quadro T1000 T400 T400 4 GB T600 T1000 T1000 8 GB

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W7000 and T600, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

FirePro W7000
2012
4 GB GDDR5, 350 Watt
10.64

T600 outperforms W7000 by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
T600 T600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking440341
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.18no data
Power efficiency5.0128.61
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code namePitcairnTU117
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 June 2012 (12 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280640
Core clock speed950 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1335 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate76.0053.40
Floating-point processing power2.432 TFLOPS1.709 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8040

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length242 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro W7000 10.64
T600 16.19
+52.2%
  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W7000 4255
T600 6472
+52.1%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

FirePro W7000 17788
T600 27848
+56.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−54.3%
54
+54.3%
1440p14−16
−64.3%
23
+64.3%
4K12−14
−66.7%
20
+66.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p25.69no data
1440p64.21no data
4K74.92no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 46
+0%
46
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 59
+0%
59
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Metro Exodus 26
+0%
26
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+0%
48
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 111
+0%
111
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27
+0%
27
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27
+0%
27
+0%
Metro Exodus 15
+0%
15
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
+0%
25
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 8
+0%
8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+0%
16
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 40
+0%
40
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how FirePro W7000 and T600 compete in popular games:

  • T600 is 54% faster in 1080p
  • T600 is 64% faster in 1440p
  • T600 is 67% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.64 16.19
Recency 13 June 2012 6 May 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 40 Watt

T600 has a 52.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 775% lower power consumption.

The T600 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W7000 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FirePro W7000
FirePro W7000
NVIDIA T600
T600
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
T600 T600
vs
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
FirePro W8000 FirePro W8000
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
vs
TITAN RTX TITAN RTX
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
Radeon 530 Radeon 530
Quadro P600 Quadro P600
vs
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GTX 780 Rev. 2
Quadro P400 Quadro P400
vs
FX 570 FX 570
FirePro V4900 FirePro V4900
vs
GTX 645 OEM GTX 645 OEM
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
GTX 560 Ti GTX 560 Ti
GeForce 940MX GeForce 940MX
vs
T400 4 GB 4 GB
GeForce 940MX GeForce 940MX
vs
GT 710 PCIe x1 GT 710 PCIe x1
GeForce 940MX GeForce 940MX
vs
GT 710 OEM GT 710 OEM
GeForce 940MX GeForce 940MX
vs
GTX 280M GTX 280M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8
60 votes

Rate FirePro W7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2
687 votes

Rate T600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W7000 or T600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.