TITAN RTX vs Quadro M4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M4000 with TITAN RTX, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M4000
2015
8 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
17.29

TITAN RTX outperforms M4000 by a whopping 183% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking31363
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.462.10
Power efficiency9.9812.09
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM204TU102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date29 June 2015 (9 years ago)18 December 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$791 $2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro M4000 has 160% better value for money than TITAN RTX.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16644608
Core clock speed773 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt280 Watt
Texture fill rate80.39509.8
Floating-point processing power2.573 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs104288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width1" (2.5 cm)2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 192 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Syncno data
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA5.27.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M4000 17.29
TITAN RTX 48.87
+183%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M4000 6671
TITAN RTX 18858
+183%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro M4000 18865
TITAN RTX 147144
+680%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro M4000 19545
TITAN RTX 123937
+534%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro M4000 16648
TITAN RTX 166517
+900%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55−60
−196%
163
+196%
1440p35−40
−197%
104
+197%
4K24−27
−208%
74
+208%

Cost per frame, $

1080p14.3815.33
1440p22.6024.03
4K32.9633.77

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 79
+0%
79
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104
+0%
104
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 104
+0%
104
+0%
Battlefield 5 209
+0%
209
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 143
+0%
143
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+0%
79
+0%
Far Cry 5 127
+0%
127
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 201
+0%
201
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 281
+0%
281
+0%
Hitman 3 117
+0%
117
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 348
+0%
348
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 127
+0%
127
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 206
+0%
206
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 215
+0%
215
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 186
+0%
186
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 88
+0%
88
+0%
Battlefield 5 203
+0%
203
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 131
+0%
131
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+0%
79
+0%
Far Cry 5 101
+0%
101
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 154
+0%
154
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 254
+0%
254
+0%
Hitman 3 116
+0%
116
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 336
+0%
336
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110
+0%
110
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 286
+0%
286
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 204
+0%
204
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 79
+0%
79
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80
+0%
80
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 102
+0%
102
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%
Far Cry 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 175
+0%
175
+0%
Hitman 3 111
+0%
111
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 218
+0%
218
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 242
+0%
242
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 139
+0%
139
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 86
+0%
86
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 123
+0%
123
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66
+0%
66
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 79
+0%
79
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+0%
66
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Hitman 3 100
+0%
100
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 168
+0%
168
+0%
Metro Exodus 114
+0%
114
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 183
+0%
183
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 205
+0%
205
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 119
+0%
119
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 88
+0%
88
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 67
+0%
67
+0%
Hitman 3 48
+0%
48
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150
+0%
150
+0%
Metro Exodus 121
+0%
121
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+0%
103
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 52
+0%
52
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 43
+0%
43
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50
+0%
50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 33
+0%
33
+0%
Far Cry 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 114
+0%
114
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 109
+0%
109
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 43
+0%
43
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 74
+0%
74
+0%

This is how Quadro M4000 and TITAN RTX compete in popular games:

  • TITAN RTX is 196% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN RTX is 197% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN RTX is 208% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.29 48.87
Recency 29 June 2015 18 December 2018
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 280 Watt

Quadro M4000 has 133.3% lower power consumption.

TITAN RTX, on the other hand, has a 182.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN RTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M4000 is a workstation graphics card while TITAN RTX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Quadro M4000
NVIDIA TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 229 votes

Rate Quadro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 809 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.