Quadro FX 5800 vs ATI FirePro V5800

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro V5800 and Quadro FX 5800, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI V5800
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 74 Watt
3.67
+15.8%

ATI V5800 outperforms FX 5800 by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking715750
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.410.04
Power efficiency3.401.15
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameJuniperGT200B
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date26 April 2010 (14 years ago)11 November 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$479 $3,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

ATI V5800 has 925% better value for money than FX 5800.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800240
Core clock speed690 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)74 Watt189 Watt
Texture fill rate27.6048.80
Floating-point processing power1.104 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4080

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s102.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI V5800 3.67
+15.8%
FX 5800 3.17

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI V5800 1415
+15.9%
FX 5800 1221

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.67 3.17
Recency 26 April 2010 11 November 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 74 Watt 189 Watt

ATI V5800 has a 15.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 155.4% lower power consumption.

FX 5800, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The FirePro V5800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 5800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V5800
FirePro V5800
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
Quadro FX 5800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 97 votes

Rate FirePro V5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 27 votes

Rate Quadro FX 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.