Tesla M2075 vs ATI FirePro V5800

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking715not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.41no data
Power efficiency3.40no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameJuniperGF110
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date26 April 2010 (14 years ago)25 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$479 $2,399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800448
Core clock speed690 MHz574 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)74 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate27.6032.14
Floating-point processing power1.104 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs4056

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mm248 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz783 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s150.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 April 2010 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 74 Watt 200 Watt

ATI V5800 has 170.3% lower power consumption.

Tesla M2075, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V5800 and Tesla M2075. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V5800
FirePro V5800
NVIDIA Tesla M2075
Tesla M2075

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 97 votes

Rate FirePro V5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Tesla M2075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.