Radeon Graphics vs ATI FirePro V4800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated897
Place by popularitynot in top-10010
Power efficiencyno data9.21
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRedwoodRenoir
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date26 April 2010 (14 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores400448
Core clock speed775 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors627 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)69 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate15.5042.00
Floating-point processing power0.62 TFLOPS1.344 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2028

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt 15 Watt

Graphics has a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 360% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V4800 and Radeon Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V4800 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V4800
FirePro V4800
AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 55 votes

Rate FirePro V4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6245 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.