Radeon Graphics vs ATI FirePro V8800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated965
Place by popularitynot in top-10012
Power efficiencyno data9.38
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameCypressRenoir
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 April 2010 (15 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1600448
Core clock speed825 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)208 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate66.0042.00
Floating-point processing power2.64 TFLOPS1.344 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs8028
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1150 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth147.2 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 208 Watt 15 Watt

Graphics has a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1286.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V8800 and Radeon Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V8800 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V8800
FirePro V8800
AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate FirePro V8800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 8092 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V8800 or Radeon Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.