Arc Pro A30M vs FirePro D700
Aggregate performance score
We've compared FirePro D700 with Arc Pro A30M, including specs and performance data.
Arc Pro A30M outperforms D700 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 367 | 345 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 3.56 | 21.13 |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2011−2020) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) |
GPU code name | Tahiti | DG2-128 |
Market segment | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 18 January 2014 (10 years ago) | 8 August 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 2000 MHz |
Number of transistors | 4,313 million | 7,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 6 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 274 Watt | 50 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 108.8 | 128.0 |
Floating-point processing power | 3.482 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 32 | 32 |
TMUs | 128 | 64 |
Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Length | 279 mm | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1370 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 263.0 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.6 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 14.01 | 15.19 |
Recency | 18 January 2014 | 8 August 2022 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 6 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 274 Watt | 50 Watt |
FirePro D700 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.
Arc Pro A30M, on the other hand, has a 8.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 448% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between FirePro D700 and Arc Pro A30M.
Be aware that FirePro D700 is a workstation card while Arc Pro A30M is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.