Quadro FX 4600 vs FirePro D300

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro D300 and Quadro FX 4600, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

FirePro D300
2014
2 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
10.19
+818%

D300 outperforms FX 4600 by a whopping 818% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4401075
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.720.58
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code namePitcairnG80
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date18 January 2014 (10 years ago)5 March 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128096
Core clock speed850 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt134 Watt
Texture fill rate68.0024.00
Floating-point processing power2.176 TFLOPS0.2304 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs8024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length242 mm229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB768 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth162.6 GB/s67.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.19 1.11
Recency 18 January 2014 5 March 2007
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 768 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 134 Watt

FirePro D300 has a 818% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

FX 4600, on the other hand, has 11.9% lower power consumption.

The FirePro D300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 4600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro D300
FirePro D300
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
Quadro FX 4600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 29 votes

Rate FirePro D300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 12 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.