Arc 7 A780 vs FirePro 2270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1274not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.69no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameCedarDG2-512
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date31 January 2011 (13 years ago)2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores804096
Core clock speed600 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors292 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate4.800563.2
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS18.02 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz17.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s559.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-591x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt

FirePro 2270 has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

Arc 7 A780, on the other hand, has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro 2270 and Arc 7 A780. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro 2270 is a workstation graphics card while Arc 7 A780 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro 2270
FirePro 2270
Intel Arc 7 A780
Arc 7 A780

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 9 votes

Rate FirePro 2270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 30 votes

Rate Arc 7 A780 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.