Radeon 740M vs ATI FireMV 2250

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated503
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data38.63
ArchitectureUltra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRV516Phoenix
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2007 (17 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data256
Core clock speed600 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2500 MHz
Number of transistors105 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate2.40040.00
Floating-point processing powerno data2.56 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs416
Ray Tracing Coresno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MBpsSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x S-Video, 1x DMS-59Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 740M has a 2150% more advanced lithography process, and 113.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireMV 2250 and Radeon 740M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireMV 2250 is a desktop card while Radeon 740M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireMV 2250
FireMV 2250
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 69 votes

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.