Radeon R5 A240 vs ATI FireGL V8650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1049
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.13
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameR600Oland
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date14 May 2007 (18 years ago)2014 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,799 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320320
Core clock speed688 MHz1030 MHz
Boost clock speedno data780 MHz
Number of transistors720 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate11.0115.60
Floating-point processing power0.4403 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs1620
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length254 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR4DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed868 MHz1800 MBps
Memory bandwidth111.1 GB/s28.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.06.5 (5.1)
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.1 (1.2)
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm

R5 A240 has a 186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V8650 and Radeon R5 A240. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V8650 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R5 A240 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V8650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon R5 A240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V8650 or Radeon R5 A240, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.