GeForce GTX 950A vs Arc Graphics 140V

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 140V and GeForce GTX 950A, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc Graphics 140V
2024
16 GB LPDDR5x
11.65
+101%

Arc Graphics 140V outperforms GTX 950A by a whopping 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking395579
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data6.14
ArchitectureXe² (2024)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUGM107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)13 March 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8640
Core clock speedno data993 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHz1124 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology3 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data44.96
Floating-point processing powerno data1.439 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xDDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB2 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1001 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data32.03 GB/s
Shared memory+no data
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 140V 11.65
+101%
GTX 950A 5.80

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 140V 5205
+101%
GTX 950A 2592

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
+122%
18−20
−122%
1440p20
+122%
9−10
−122%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 63
+110%
30−33
−110%
Counter-Strike 2 87
+118%
40−45
−118%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 44
+110%
21−24
−110%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+104%
27−30
−104%
Counter-Strike 2 85
+113%
40−45
−113%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Far Cry 5 51
+113%
24−27
−113%
Fortnite 70−75
+109%
35−40
−109%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+125%
24−27
−125%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%
Valorant 110−120
+120%
50−55
−120%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30
+114%
14−16
−114%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+104%
27−30
−104%
Counter-Strike 2 42
+133%
18−20
−133%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+109%
85−90
−109%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Far Cry 5 45
+114%
21−24
−114%
Fortnite 70−75
+109%
35−40
−109%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+125%
24−27
−125%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+110%
21−24
−110%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+107%
30−33
−107%
Valorant 110−120
+120%
50−55
−120%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+104%
27−30
−104%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Far Cry 5 42
+133%
18−20
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+125%
24−27
−125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+133%
12−14
−133%
Valorant 110−120
+120%
50−55
−120%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
+109%
35−40
−109%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+111%
45−50
−111%
Grand Theft Auto V 18
+125%
8−9
−125%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+110%
50−55
−110%
Valorant 130−140
+108%
65−70
−108%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+113%
16−18
−113%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Far Cry 5 35
+119%
16−18
−119%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+125%
12−14
−125%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Valorant 65−70
+127%
30−33
−127%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%

This is how Arc Graphics 140V and GTX 950A compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140V is 122% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Graphics 140V is 122% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.65 5.80
Recency 24 September 2024 13 March 2015
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 3 nm 28 nm

Arc Graphics 140V has a 100.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Graphics 140V is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 950A in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
GeForce GTX 950A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 15 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 140V or GeForce GTX 950A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.