RTX A400 vs Arc A750

Place in the ranking	181	372
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	56.39	no data
Power efficiency	9.75	19.54
Architecture	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	DG2-512	GA107
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	12 October 2022 (2 years ago)	16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$289	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	768
Core clock speed	2050 MHz	727 MHz
Boost clock speed	2400 MHz	1762 MHz
Number of transistors	21,700 million	8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	537.6	42.29
Floating-point processing power	17.2 TFLOPS	2.706 TFLOPS
ROPs	112	16
TMUs	224	24
Tensor Cores	448	24
Ray Tracing Cores	28	6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	163 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0	4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A750 30.42
+125%

RTX A400 13.54

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A750 12250
+125%

RTX A400 5453

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	109 +142%	45−50 −142%
1440p	59 +146%	24−27 −146%
4K	36 +125%	16−18 −125%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.65	no data
1440p	4.90	no data
4K	8.03	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2

91
+128%

40−45

−128%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +130%	40−45 −130%
Counter-Strike 2	88 +151%	35−40 −151%
Forza Horizon 4	285 +138%	120−130 −138%
Forza Horizon 5	80−85 +137%	35−40 −137%
Metro Exodus	116 +132%	50−55 −132%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +144%	27−30 −144%
Valorant	120−130 +131%	55−60 −131%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +130%	40−45 −130%
Counter-Strike 2	76 +153%	30−33 −153%
Dota 2	99 +148%	40−45 −148%
Far Cry 5	68 +127%	30−33 −127%
Fortnite	140−150 +129%	65−70 −129%
Forza Horizon 4	239 +139%	100−105 −139%
Forza Horizon 5	80−85 +137%	35−40 −137%
Grand Theft Auto V	99 +148%	40−45 −148%
Metro Exodus	94 +135%	40−45 −135%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 +128%	80−85 −128%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +144%	27−30 −144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−110 +140%	45−50 −140%
Valorant	120−130 +131%	55−60 −131%
World of Tanks	270−280 +130%	120−130 −130%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +130%	40−45 −130%
Counter-Strike 2	75 +150%	30−33 −150%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +151%	35−40 −151%
Forza Horizon 4	199 +134%	85−90 −134%
Forza Horizon 5	80−85 +137%	35−40 −137%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 +128%	80−85 −128%
Valorant	120−130 +131%	55−60 −131%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	41 +128%	18−20 −128%
Grand Theft Auto V	41 +128%	18−20 −128%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 +131%	65−70 −131%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%
World of Tanks	200−210 +128%	90−95 −128%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +130%	27−30 −130%
Far Cry 5	100−105 +150%	40−45 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	145 +142%	60−65 −142%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 +148%	21−24 −148%
Metro Exodus	86 +146%	35−40 −146%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	57 +138%	24−27 −138%
Valorant	90−95 +130%	40−45 −130%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Dota 2	45 +150%	18−20 −150%
Grand Theft Auto V	45 +150%	18−20 −150%
Metro Exodus	43 +139%	18−20 −139%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−105 +150%	40−45 −150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 +150%	8−9 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45 +150%	18−20 −150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +150%	14−16 −150%
Counter-Strike 2	14 +133%	6−7 −133%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +144%	18−20 −144%
Fortnite	40−45 +133%	18−20 −133%
Forza Horizon 4	84 +140%	35−40 −140%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +133%	12−14 −133%
Valorant	45−50 +161%	18−20 −161%

This is how Arc A750 and RTX A400 compete in popular games:

Arc A750 is 142% faster in 1080p
Arc A750 is 146% faster in 1440p
Arc A750 is 125% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	30.42	13.54
Recency	12 October 2022	16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	50 Watt