RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs Arc A750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A750 with RTX 5000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

Arc A750
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 225 Watt
31.10

RTX 5000 Ada Generation outperforms Arc A750 by a whopping 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking17614
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation55.38no data
Power efficiency9.6320.82
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-512AD102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 October 2022 (2 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$289 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores358412800
Core clock speed2050 MHz1155 MHz
Boost clock speed2400 MHz2550 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate537.61,020
Floating-point processing power17.2 TFLOPS65.28 TFLOPS
ROPs112176
TMUs224400
Tensor Cores448400
Ray Tracing Cores28100

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.04x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A750 31.10
RTX 5000 Ada Generation 74.68
+140%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A750 11998
RTX 5000 Ada Generation 28810
+140%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110
−136%
260−270
+136%
1440p59
−137%
140−150
+137%
4K36
−136%
85−90
+136%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.63no data
1440p4.90no data
4K8.03no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
−126%
140−150
+126%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90
−133%
210−220
+133%
Battlefield 5 140−150
−113%
300−310
+113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
−139%
210−220
+139%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−139%
220−230
+139%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
−131%
250−260
+131%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
−123%
450−500
+123%
Hitman 3 90−95
−134%
220−230
+134%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
−125%
400−450
+125%
Metro Exodus 144
−108%
300−310
+108%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
−132%
230−240
+132%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 160−170
−112%
350−400
+112%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
−122%
300−310
+122%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 106
−136%
250−260
+136%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76
−137%
180−190
+137%
Battlefield 5 140−150
−113%
300−310
+113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
−139%
210−220
+139%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−139%
220−230
+139%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
−131%
250−260
+131%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
−123%
450−500
+123%
Hitman 3 90−95
−134%
220−230
+134%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
−125%
400−450
+125%
Metro Exodus 143
−110%
300−310
+110%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
−132%
230−240
+132%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 239
−130%
550−600
+130%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
−131%
210−220
+131%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
−122%
300−310
+122%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45
−122%
100−105
+122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 69
−132%
160−170
+132%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
−139%
210−220
+139%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−139%
220−230
+139%
Forza Horizon 4 90
−133%
210−220
+133%
Hitman 3 90−95
−134%
220−230
+134%
Horizon Zero Dawn 113
−139%
270−280
+139%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 199
−126%
450−500
+126%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 69
−132%
160−170
+132%
Watch Dogs: Legion 63
−138%
150−160
+138%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
−132%
230−240
+132%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−133%
200−210
+133%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−139%
160−170
+139%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 38
−137%
90−95
+137%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 54
−122%
120−130
+122%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−131%
120−130
+131%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−135%
120−130
+135%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
−130%
550−600
+130%
Hitman 3 55−60
−124%
130−140
+124%
Horizon Zero Dawn 92
−139%
220−230
+139%
Metro Exodus 86
−133%
200−210
+133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 145
−107%
300−310
+107%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
−128%
130−140
+128%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
−121%
450−500
+121%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
−137%
180−190
+137%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−122%
100−105
+122%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−137%
90−95
+137%
Hitman 3 35−40
−136%
85−90
+136%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
−132%
450−500
+132%
Metro Exodus 80
−138%
190−200
+138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 69
−132%
160−170
+132%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 28
−132%
65−70
+132%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30
−133%
70−75
+133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−124%
65−70
+124%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−131%
60−65
+131%
Forza Horizon 4 61
−130%
140−150
+130%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 84
−138%
200−210
+138%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30
−133%
70−75
+133%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−138%
95−100
+138%

This is how Arc A750 and RTX 5000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 136% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 137% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 136% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.10 74.68
Recency 12 October 2022 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 250 Watt

Arc A750 has 11.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 140.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A750 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A750 is a desktop card while RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A750
Arc A750
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 809 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 75 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.