Radeon 740M vs Arc A580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A580 with Radeon 740M, including specs and performance data.

Arc A580
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 175 Watt
30.99
+275%

Arc A580 outperforms 740M by a whopping 275% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking182508
Place by popularity84not in top-100
Power efficiency12.1937.95
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-512Phoenix
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 October 2023 (1 year ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072256
Core clock speed1700 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed2000 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate384.040.00
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS2.56 TFLOPS
ROPs968
TMUs19216
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0Portable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A580 30.99
+275%
Radeon 740M 8.27

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A580 11916
+275%
Radeon 740M 3181

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc A580 35210
+370%
Radeon 740M 7490

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc A580 27574
+437%
Radeon 740M 5135

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD103
+390%
21
−390%
1440p55
+293%
14−16
−293%
4K33
+313%
8−9
−313%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 98
+513%
16−18
−513%
Elden Ring 81
+252%
21−24
−252%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+233%
27−30
−233%
Counter-Strike 2 83
+419%
16−18
−419%
Forza Horizon 4 258
+449%
47
−449%
Metro Exodus 134
+509%
21−24
−509%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+178%
21−24
−178%
Valorant 120−130
+328%
27−30
−328%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+233%
27−30
−233%
Counter-Strike 2 74
+469%
13
−469%
Dota 2 86
+169%
32
−169%
Elden Ring 100−110
+357%
21−24
−357%
Far Cry 5 63
+200%
21
−200%
Fortnite 140−150
+198%
45−50
−198%
Forza Horizon 4 214
+478%
37
−478%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+197%
27−30
−197%
Metro Exodus 97
+341%
21−24
−341%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+171%
65−70
−171%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+178%
21−24
−178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+320%
24−27
−320%
Valorant 120−130
+328%
27−30
−328%
World of Tanks 270−280
+122%
120−130
−122%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+233%
27−30
−233%
Counter-Strike 2 67
+319%
16−18
−319%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+146%
35−40
−146%
Forza Horizon 4 177
+490%
30
−490%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+171%
65−70
−171%
Valorant 120−130
+328%
27−30
−328%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 37
+311%
9−10
−311%
Elden Ring 55−60
+427%
10−12
−427%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+270%
10−11
−270%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+327%
40−45
−327%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
World of Tanks 200−210
+233%
60−65
−233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+307%
14−16
−307%
Counter-Strike 2 44
+340%
10−11
−340%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+465%
16−18
−465%
Forza Horizon 4 130
+665%
16−18
−665%
Metro Exodus 91
+550%
14−16
−550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+450%
10−11
−450%
Valorant 85−90
+324%
21−24
−324%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 19
+850%
2−3
−850%
Dota 2 38
+100%
18−20
−100%
Elden Ring 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Grand Theft Auto V 38
+111%
18−20
−111%
Metro Exodus 37
+825%
4−5
−825%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+304%
24−27
−304%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
+111%
18−20
−111%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+386%
7−8
−386%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+330%
10−11
−330%
Fortnite 40−45
+413%
8−9
−413%
Forza Horizon 4 73
+711%
9−10
−711%
Valorant 45−50
+463%
8−9
−463%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how Arc A580 and Radeon 740M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A580 is 390% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A580 is 293% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A580 is 313% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A580 is 1400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A580 is ahead in 55 tests (90%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.99 8.27
Recency 10 October 2023 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 15 Watt

Arc A580 has a 274.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 9 months.

Radeon 740M, on the other hand, has a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 1066.7% lower power consumption.

The Arc A580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 740M in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A580 is a desktop card while Radeon 740M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A580
Arc A580
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 330 votes

Rate Arc A580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 84 votes

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.