Quadro 3000M X2 vs Arc A580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking188not rated
Place by popularity58not in top-100
Power efficiency12.06no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameDG2-512EXMF104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date10 October 2023 (1 year ago)22 February 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072240 ×2
Core clock speed1700 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed2000 MHzno data
Number of transistors21,700 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate384.018.00 ×2
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS0.432 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs9632 ×2
TMUs19240 ×2
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed2000 MHz625 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s80 GB/s ×2
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0Portable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.65.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-2.1
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 October 2023 22 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 150 Watt

Arc A580 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

3000M X2, on the other hand, has 16.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arc A580 and Quadro 3000M X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc A580 is a desktop card while Quadro 3000M X2 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A580
Arc A580
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2
Quadro 3000M X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 368 votes

Rate Arc A580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro 3000M X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A580 or Quadro 3000M X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.