Radeon 760M vs Arc A370M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A370M with Radeon 760M, including specs and performance data.

Arc A370M
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
13.27

760M outperforms Arc A370M by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking386354
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.9968.10
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-128Phoenix
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024512
Core clock speed300 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1550 MHz2599 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate99.2083.17
Floating-point processing power3.174 TFLOPS5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs6432
Ray Tracing Cores88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A370M 13.27
Radeon 760M 14.90
+12.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A370M 5115
Radeon 760M 5743
+12.3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc A370M 12090
+25.9%
Radeon 760M 9603

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc A370M 8149
+32.7%
Radeon 760M 6142

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc A370M 35604
Radeon 760M 41767
+17.3%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Arc A370M 3885
+83.6%
Radeon 760M 2116

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD39
+21.9%
32
−21.9%
1440p21
+10.5%
19
−10.5%
4K40
+0%
40−45
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 46
+53.3%
30
−53.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 33
+32%
24−27
−32%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+54.2%
24
−54.2%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+2.8%
35−40
−2.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+2.4%
40−45
−2.4%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+3%
95−100
−3%
Hitman 3 30−33
+3.4%
27−30
−3.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+3.9%
75−80
−3.9%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+3.8%
50−55
−3.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+2.4%
40−45
−2.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+1.3%
75−80
−1.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20
−25%
24−27
+25%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+38.9%
18
−38.9%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+2.8%
35−40
−2.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+2.4%
40−45
−2.4%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+3%
95−100
−3%
Hitman 3 30−33
+3.4%
27−30
−3.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+3.9%
75−80
−3.9%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+3.8%
50−55
−3.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+2.4%
40−45
−2.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 62
+40.9%
44
−40.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+2.8%
35−40
−2.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+1.3%
75−80
−1.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18
−38.9%
24−27
+38.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+2.8%
35−40
−2.8%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+3%
95−100
−3%
Hitman 3 30−33
+3.4%
27−30
−3.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+3.9%
75−80
−3.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53
+43.2%
37
−43.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+13%
23
−13%
Watch Dogs: Legion 15
−427%
75−80
+427%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+2.4%
40−45
−2.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+6.9%
27−30
−6.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+4.3%
21−24
−4.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+5%
80−85
−5%
Hitman 3 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 37
+32.1%
27−30
−32.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+3.2%
90−95
−3.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+4%
24−27
−4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Hitman 3 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+5.3%
75−80
−5.3%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how Arc A370M and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A370M is 22% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A370M is 11% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Arc A370M is 54% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 760M is 427% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A370M is ahead in 59 tests (82%)
  • Radeon 760M is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
  • there's a draw in 9 tests (13%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.27 14.90
Recency 30 March 2022 8 January 2024
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 760M has a 12.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 760M is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A370M in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A370M is a notebook card while Radeon 760M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M
AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 165 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 191 vote

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.