GeForce GTX 760M vs Arc A350M

Place in the ranking	355	662
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	41.09	5.65
Architecture	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	DG2-128	GK106
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	768
Core clock speed	300 MHz	657 MHz
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	657 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	55 Watt
Texture fill rate	55.20	42.05
Floating-point processing power	1.766 TFLOPS	1.009 TFLOPS
ROPs	24	16
TMUs	48	64
Ray Tracing Cores	6	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Bus support	no data	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
SLI options	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Standard memory configuration	no data	GDDR5
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	64.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
eDP 1.2 signal support	no data	Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support	no data	Up to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display support	no data	Up to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	no data	Up to 3840x2160
HDMI	-	+
HDCP content protection	-	+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	-	+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support	-	+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	-	+
Optimus	-	+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 API
Shader Model	6.6	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	3.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.1.126
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A350M 14.73
+230%

GTX 760M 4.46

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc A350M 10730
+218%

GTX 760M 3369

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Arc A350M 31023
+121%

GTX 760M 14007

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc A350M 7147
+215%

GTX 760M 2271

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc A350M 36315
+128%

GTX 760M 15900

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	130−140 +217%	41 −217%
Full HD	35 −25.7%	44 +25.7%
1440p	17 +240%	5−6 −240%
4K	9 +350%	2−3 −350%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

27
+238%

8−9

−238%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +175%	12−14 −175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35 +775%	4−5 −775%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +318%	10−12 −318%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +190%	10−11 −190%
Cyberpunk 2077	19 +138%	8−9 −138%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +267%	9−10 −267%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +225%	12−14 −225%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +244%	27−30 −244%
Hitman 3	27−30 +170%	10−11 −170%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +143%	30−33 −143%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +380%	10−11 −380%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +225%	12−14 −225%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +188%	16−18 −188%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +72.7%	40−45 −72.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +175%	12−14 −175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20 +400%	4−5 −400%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +318%	10−12 −318%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +190%	10−11 −190%
Cyberpunk 2077	16 +100%	8−9 −100%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +267%	9−10 −267%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +225%	12−14 −225%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +244%	27−30 −244%
Hitman 3	27−30 +170%	10−11 −170%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +143%	30−33 −143%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +380%	10−11 −380%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +225%	12−14 −225%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	53 +231%	16−18 −231%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +100%	16−18 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +72.7%	40−45 −72.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +175%	12−14 −175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16 +300%	4−5 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +190%	10−11 −190%
Cyberpunk 2077	12 +50%	8−9 −50%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +267%	9−10 −267%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +244%	27−30 −244%
Hitman 3	27−30 +170%	10−11 −170%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +143%	30−33 −143%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45 +181%	16−18 −181%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	19 +11.8%	16−18 −11.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +72.7%	40−45 −72.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40
+225%

12−14

−225%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +250%	8−9 −250%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +214%	7−8 −214%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14 +250%	4−5 −250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +813%	8−9 −813%
Hitman 3	16−18 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +190%	10−11 −190%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +2400%	1−2 −2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	37 +270%	10−11 −270%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +214%	27−30 −214%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
+188%

8−9

−188%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Hitman 3	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +2267%	3−4 −2267%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	15	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Far Cry 5	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	19 +280%	5−6 −280%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14
+160%

5−6

−160%

This is how Arc A350M and GTX 760M compete in popular games:

Arc A350M is 217% faster in 900p
GTX 760M is 26% faster in 1080p
Arc A350M is 240% faster in 1440p
Arc A350M is 350% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A350M is 2400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Arc A350M surpassed GTX 760M in all 67 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.73	4.46
Recency	30 March 2022	30 May 2013
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	55 Watt

Arc A350M has a 230.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 120% lower power consumption.

The Arc A350M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 760M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.