Radeon 890M vs Arc A350

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated252
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data100.00
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code nameDG2-128Strix Point
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2022 (2 years ago)15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681024
Core clock speed2000 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed2000 MHz2900 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate96.00185.6
Floating-point processing power3.072 TFLOPS5.939 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs4864
Tensor Cores96no data
Ray Tracing Cores616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1937 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth124.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 890M has a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arc A350 and Radeon 890M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc A350 is a desktop card while Radeon 890M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A350
Arc A350
AMD Radeon 890M
Radeon 890M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3 votes

Rate Arc A350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 97 votes

Rate Radeon 890M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.