Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Arc 8-Core iGPU

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 8-Core iGPU with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Arc 8-Core iGPU
2023
18.48
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
27.30
+47.7%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Arc 8-Core iGPU by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking299202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data53.47
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUAD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82048
Core clock speedno data1485 MHz
Boost clock speed2300 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data129.6
Floating-point processing powerno data8.294 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc 8-Core iGPU 18.48
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.30
+47.7%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc 8-Core iGPU 12375
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239
+63.5%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Arc 8-Core iGPU 38877
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 66297
+70.5%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc 8-Core iGPU 8561
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136
+65.1%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Arc 8-Core iGPU 3277
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 5278
+61.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
1440p19
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
4K13
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−47.5%
90−95
+47.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−39.5%
60−65
+39.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−40%
70−75
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−45.3%
170−180
+45.3%
Hitman 3 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−42.9%
130−140
+42.9%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−40.6%
90−95
+40.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−40%
70−75
+40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
−47.5%
90−95
+47.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−47.7%
130−140
+47.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−47.5%
90−95
+47.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−39.5%
60−65
+39.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−40%
70−75
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−45.3%
170−180
+45.3%
Hitman 3 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−42.9%
130−140
+42.9%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−40.6%
90−95
+40.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−40%
70−75
+40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 58
−46.6%
85−90
+46.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−47.7%
130−140
+47.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−39.5%
60−65
+39.5%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−45.3%
170−180
+45.3%
Hitman 3 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 41
−46.3%
60−65
+46.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 46
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−47.7%
130−140
+47.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−40%
70−75
+40%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−47.1%
150−160
+47.1%
Hitman 3 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−47.1%
50−55
+47.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 34
−47.1%
50−55
+47.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−44.1%
160−170
+44.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Hitman 3 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−45.8%
140−150
+45.8%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%

This is how Arc 8-Core iGPU and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 39% faster in 1080p
  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 42% faster in 1440p
  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 38% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.48 27.30
Recency 14 December 2023 26 February 2024

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 47.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 months.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 8-Core iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc 8-Core iGPU is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Arc 8-Core iGPU
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 33 votes

Rate Arc 8-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 18 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.