GeForce GTX 590 vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU
Aggregate performance score
We've compared M1 8-Core GPU with GeForce GTX 590, including specs and performance data.
Apple M1 8-Core GPU outperforms GTX 590 by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 379 | 497 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.77 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 1.64 |
| Architecture | no data | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | no data | GF110 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 10 November 2020 (4 years ago) | 24 March 2011 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $699 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1278 MHz | 607 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 365 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | no data | 97 °C |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 38.91 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 1.244 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 48 |
| TMUs | no data | 64 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | no data | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 279 mm |
| Height | no data | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 8-pin |
| SLI options | - | + |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) |
| Memory bus width | no data | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1707 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 327.7 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | Three Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort |
| Multi monitor support | no data | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
| Audio input for HDMI | no data | Internal |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.2 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
| CUDA | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 70−75
+48.9%
| 47
−48.9%
|
| Full HD | 27
−300%
| 108
+300%
|
| 1200p | 170−180
+51.8%
| 112
−51.8%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | no data | 6.47 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
+41.2%
|
16−18
−41.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+58.8%
|
16−18
−58.8%
|
| Elden Ring | 40−45
+70.8%
|
24−27
−70.8%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+60.7%
|
27−30
−60.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
+41.2%
|
16−18
−41.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+58.8%
|
16−18
−58.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+57.1%
|
35−40
−57.1%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
+60.9%
|
21−24
−60.9%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−35
+41.7%
|
24−27
−41.7%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
+74.2%
|
30−35
−74.2%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+60.7%
|
27−30
−60.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
+41.2%
|
16−18
−41.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+58.8%
|
16−18
−58.8%
|
| Dota 2 | 45−50
+58.1%
|
30−35
−58.1%
|
| Elden Ring | 40−45
+70.8%
|
24−27
−70.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+40.5%
|
35−40
−40.5%
|
| Fortnite | 75−80
+51%
|
50−55
−51%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+57.1%
|
35−40
−57.1%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 45−50
+58.1%
|
30−35
−58.1%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
+60.9%
|
21−24
−60.9%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−105
+47.1%
|
65−70
−47.1%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−35
+41.7%
|
24−27
−41.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+61.5%
|
24−27
−61.5%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
+74.2%
|
30−35
−74.2%
|
| World of Tanks | 180−190
+41.1%
|
120−130
−41.1%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+60.7%
|
27−30
−60.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
+41.2%
|
16−18
−41.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+58.8%
|
16−18
−58.8%
|
| Dota 2 | 45−50
+58.1%
|
30−35
−58.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+40.5%
|
35−40
−40.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+57.1%
|
35−40
−57.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−105
+47.1%
|
65−70
−47.1%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
+74.2%
|
30−35
−74.2%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 18−20
+90%
|
10−11
−90%
|
| Elden Ring | 21−24
+75%
|
12−14
−75%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+81.8%
|
10−12
−81.8%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−110
+160%
|
40−45
−160%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
+71.4%
|
7−8
−71.4%
|
| World of Tanks | 95−100
+54%
|
60−65
−54%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+68.8%
|
16−18
−68.8%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+20%
|
10−11
−20%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+66.7%
|
6−7
−66.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+77.8%
|
18−20
−77.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+83.3%
|
18−20
−83.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 27−30
+93.3%
|
14−16
−93.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+70%
|
10−11
−70%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
+54.5%
|
21−24
−54.5%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+200%
|
3−4
−200%
|
| Dota 2 | 24−27
+26.3%
|
18−20
−26.3%
|
| Elden Ring | 9−10
+80%
|
5−6
−80%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+26.3%
|
18−20
−26.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 9−10
+125%
|
4−5
−125%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45
+60%
|
24−27
−60%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+26.3%
|
18−20
−26.3%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+85.7%
|
7−8
−85.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+200%
|
3−4
−200%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
| Dota 2 | 24−27
+26.3%
|
18−20
−26.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16−18
+70%
|
10−11
−70%
|
| Fortnite | 14−16
+66.7%
|
9−10
−66.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+90%
|
10−11
−90%
|
| Valorant | 14−16
+87.5%
|
8−9
−87.5%
|
This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and GTX 590 compete in popular games:
- Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 49% faster in 900p
- GTX 590 is 300% faster in 1080p
- Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 52% faster in 1200p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 200% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, Apple M1 8-Core GPU surpassed GTX 590 in all 63 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.71 | 8.69 |
| Recency | 10 November 2020 | 24 March 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 40 nm |
Apple M1 8-Core GPU has a 57.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
The M1 8-Core GPU is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 590 in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M1 8-Core GPU is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 590 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
