A9-9420e vs Xeon X3440

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3440
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
1.75
+150%
A9-9420e
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.70

Xeon X3440 outperforms A9-9420e by a whopping 150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3440 and A9-9420e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20252705
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency1.744.42
Architecture codenameno dataStoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)1 June 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3440 and A9-9420e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.53 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.93 GHzno data
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3440 and A9-9420e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156BGA
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3440 and A9-9420e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Virtualization,
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X3440 and A9-9420e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3440 and A9-9420e are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3440 and A9-9420e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3440 and A9-9420e.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3440 1.75
+150%
A9-9420e 0.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3440 2773
+150%
A9-9420e 1107

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.75 0.70
Recency 1 July 2009 1 June 2018
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon X3440 has a 150% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

A9-9420e, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X3440 is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9420e in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3440 is a server/workstation processor while A9-9420e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3440 and A9-9420e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3440
Xeon X3440
AMD A9-9420e
A9-9420e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 648 votes

Rate Xeon X3440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 149 votes

Rate A9-9420e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3440 or A9-9420e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.