A9-9410 vs Xeon X3440

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3440
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
1.75
+82.3%
A9-9410
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.96

Xeon X3440 outperforms A9-9410 by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3440 and A9-9410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20232491
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency1.746.06
Architecture codenameno dataStoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3440 and A9-9410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.53 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz3.5 GHz
L2 cacheno data2048 KB
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data125 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3440 and A9-9410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FP4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3440 and A9-9410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Virtualization,
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X3440 and A9-9410 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3440 and A9-9410 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3440 and A9-9410. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data3
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X3440 and A9-9410 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon X3440 and A9-9410 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3440 and A9-9410.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes168

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3440 1.75
+82.3%
A9-9410 0.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3440 2773
+82.2%
A9-9410 1522

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.75 0.96
Recency 1 July 2009 31 May 2016
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon X3440 has a 82.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

A9-9410, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X3440 is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9410 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3440 is a server/workstation processor while A9-9410 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3440 and A9-9410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3440
Xeon X3440
AMD A9-9410
A9-9410

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 648 votes

Rate Xeon X3440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 113 votes

Rate A9-9410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3440 or A9-9410, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.