Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Xeon X3360

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3360
2008
95 Watt
1.55
+32.5%
Core 2 Quad Q6600
4 cores / 4 threads, 105 Watt
1.17

Xeon X3360 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q6600 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3360 and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21312373
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataCore 2 Quad (Desktop)
Power efficiency1.521.03
Architecture codenameno dataKentsfield (2007)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3360 and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data4 (Quad-Core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speed2.83 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3360 and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketLGA775no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3360 and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Xeon X3360 and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3360 and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3360 1.55
+32.5%
Core 2 Quad Q6600 1.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3360 2412
+32.6%
Core 2 Quad Q6600 1819

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon X3360 417
+55.6%
Core 2 Quad Q6600 268

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon X3360 1328
+73.8%
Core 2 Quad Q6600 764

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.55 1.17
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 105 Watt

Xeon X3360 has a 32.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 10.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X3360 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q6600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3360 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Quad Q6600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3360 and Core 2 Quad Q6600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3360
Xeon X3360
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Core 2 Quad Q6600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 46 votes

Rate Xeon X3360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1760 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3360 or Core 2 Quad Q6600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.