Core 2 Quad Q8400 vs Xeon X3350

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3350
2008
95 Watt
1.42
+9.2%
Core 2 Quad Q8400
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.30

Xeon X3350 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q8400 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3350 and Core 2 Quad Q8400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22032281
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.411.30
Architecture codenameno dataYorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)19 April 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3350 and Core 2 Quad Q8400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data4 (Quad-Core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speedno data0.67 GHz
Bus rateno data1333 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data2x 82 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistorsno data456 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625V0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3350 and Core 2 Quad Q8400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA775FCLGA775,LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3350 and Core 2 Quad Q8400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching+-
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Xeon X3350 and Core 2 Quad Q8400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3350 and Core 2 Quad Q8400 are enumerated here.

VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3350 and Core 2 Quad Q8400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3350 and Core 2 Quad Q8400.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3350 1.42
+9.2%
Core 2 Quad Q8400 1.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3350 2263
+9.4%
Core 2 Quad Q8400 2068

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon X3350 401
+22.3%
Core 2 Quad Q8400 328

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon X3350 1253
+39.7%
Core 2 Quad Q8400 897

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.42 1.30
Recency 1 January 2008 19 April 2009

Xeon X3350 has a 9.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Core 2 Quad Q8400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon X3350 and Core 2 Quad Q8400.

Be aware that Xeon X3350 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Quad Q8400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3350 and Core 2 Quad Q8400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3350
Xeon X3350
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400
Core 2 Quad Q8400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 6 votes

Rate Xeon X3350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1346 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3350 or Core 2 Quad Q8400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.