Processor N100 vs Xeon W-3275M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
26.03
+967%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Processor N100 by a whopping 967% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275M and Processor N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1931778
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.96no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon WIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency11.5837.08
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,453$128

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275M and Processor N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads564
Base clock speed2.5 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.75 MB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache28 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache38.5 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature76 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275M and Processor N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275M and Processor N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275M and Processor N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275M and Processor N100 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275M and Processor N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size2 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275M and Processor N100.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes649

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.03 2.44
Recency 3 June 2019 3 January 2023
Physical cores 28 4
Threads 56 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon W-3275M has a 966.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads.

Processor N100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 3316.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation processor while Processor N100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275M and Processor N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M
Intel Processor N100
Processor N100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 63 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1183 votes

Rate Processor N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275M or Processor N100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.