EPYC 7573X vs Xeon Silver 4116

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4116
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 85 Watt
9.22
EPYC 7573X
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
43.28
+369%

EPYC 7573X outperforms Xeon Silver 4116 by a whopping 369% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7573X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking86056
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.70no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Silverno data
Power efficiency10.3314.72
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Milan-X (2022)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,002no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7573X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads2464
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16.5 MB (shared)768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,000 million33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7573X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7573X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7573X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7573X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7573X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7573X.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Silver 4116 9.22
EPYC 7573X 43.28
+369%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4116 14796
EPYC 7573X 69432
+369%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.22 43.28
Recency 11 July 2017 22 March 2022
Physical cores 12 32
Threads 24 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 280 Watt

Xeon Silver 4116 has 229.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7573X, on the other hand, has a 369.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7573X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4116 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4116
Xeon Silver 4116
AMD EPYC 7573X
EPYC 7573X

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 16 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4116 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7573X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7573X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.