EPYC 7573X vs Xeon Platinum 8175M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8175M
24 cores / 48 threads
16.78
EPYC 7573X
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
43.71
+160%

EPYC 7573X outperforms Xeon Platinum 8175M by a whopping 160% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7573X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking39449
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiencyno data14.77
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Milan-X (2022)
Release dateno data22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7573X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads4864
Base clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.5 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache24 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache33 MB768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7573X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketSocket PSP3
Power consumption (TDP)no data280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7573X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7573X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7573X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7573X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1,536 GB tdp=240 Wattno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7573X.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8175M 16.78
EPYC 7573X 43.71
+160%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8175M 26659
EPYC 7573X 69432
+160%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.78 43.71
Physical cores 24 32
Threads 48 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

EPYC 7573X has a 160.5% higher aggregate performance score, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7573X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8175M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7573X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8175M
Xeon Platinum 8175M
AMD EPYC 7573X
EPYC 7573X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 26 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8175M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7573X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8175M or EPYC 7573X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.