Apple M1 vs Xeon Platinum 9282
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Platinum 9282 and Apple M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 1207 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | Intel Xeon Platinum | Apple Apple M-Series |
Architecture codename | Cascade Lake-AP (2019) | no data |
Release date | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 10 November 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Platinum 9282 and Apple M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 56 (Hexapentaconta-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 112 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.064 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 26 | no data |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 2 MB |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 16 MB |
L3 cache | 77 MB (shared) | 16 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
Number of transistors | 8,000 million | 16000 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Platinum 9282 and Apple M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 | no data |
Socket | Intel BGA5903 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 9282 and Apple M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
TSX | + | - |
SIPP | + | - |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon Platinum 9282 and Apple M1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 9282 and Apple M1 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 9282 and Apple M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
Max memory channels | 12 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 281.6 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M1 8-Core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 2 April 2019 | 10 November 2020 |
Physical cores | 56 | 8 |
Threads | 112 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
Xeon Platinum 9282 has 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads.
Apple M1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 9282 and Apple M1. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon Platinum 9282 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 9282 and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.