Xeon W-3265M vs Platinum 8173M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8173M
28 cores / 56 threads
20.58
Xeon W-3265M
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
20.71
+0.6%

W-3265M outperforms Platinum 8173M by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3265M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking247245
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.7717.64
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumIntel Xeon W
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release dateno data3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,353
Current price$1999 $1456 (0.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3265M has 2191% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8173M.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3265M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads5648
Base clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache1.75 MB1.5 MB
L2 cache28 MB24 MB
L3 cache38.5 MB33 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data78 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3265M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSocket PFCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)no data205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3265M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3265M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3265M are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3265M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size1,536 GB2 TB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3265M.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8173M 20.58
Xeon W-3265M 20.71
+0.6%

W-3265M outperforms Platinum 8173M by 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Platinum 8173M 31837
Xeon W-3265M 32025
+0.6%

W-3265M outperforms Platinum 8173M by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.58 20.71
Physical cores 28 24
Threads 56 48

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3265M.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3265M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M
Xeon Platinum 8173M
Intel Xeon W-3265M
Xeon W-3265M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 8 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8173M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon W-3265M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8173M or Xeon W-3265M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.