Xeon Bronze 3408U vs Phi 7230
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Phi 7230 and Xeon Bronze 3408U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 1092 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 27.68 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Power efficiency | no data | 4.56 |
Architecture codename | Knights Landing (2016) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
Release date | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) | 10 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $425 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Phi 7230 and Xeon Bronze 3408U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 256 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
L1 cache | 32 KB (per core) | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB (shared) | 22.5 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 79 °C |
Number of transistors | 8,000 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Phi 7230 and Xeon Bronze 3408U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | 3647 | FCLGA4677 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 215 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 7230 and Xeon Bronze 3408U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
TSX | - | + |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Phi 7230 and Xeon Bronze 3408U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | no data | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 7230 and Xeon Bronze 3408U are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 7230 and Xeon Bronze 3408U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5-4000 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Phi 7230 and Xeon Bronze 3408U.
PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 20 June 2016 | 10 January 2023 |
Physical cores | 64 | 8 |
Threads | 256 | 8 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 215 Watt | 125 Watt |
Xeon Phi 7230 has 700% more physical cores and 3100% more threads.
Xeon Bronze 3408U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and 72% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Phi 7230 and Xeon Bronze 3408U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Phi 7230 and Xeon Bronze 3408U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.