A6-9120C SoC vs Xeon MP 2.83

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon MP 2.83 and A6-9120C SoC processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Architecture codenamePotomac (2005)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release dateMarch 2005 (19 years ago)7 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon MP 2.83 and A6-9120C SoC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.83 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache16 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MBno data
Chip lithography90 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data124 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors286 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon MP 2.83 and A6-9120C SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket604FT4
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon MP 2.83 and A6-9120C SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon MP 2.83 and A6-9120C SoC are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon MP 2.83 and A6-9120C SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon R4

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 6 Watt

A6-9120C SoC has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 2150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon MP 2.83 and A6-9120C SoC. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon MP 2.83 is a server/workstation processor while A6-9120C SoC is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon MP 2.83 and A6-9120C SoC, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon MP 2.83
Xeon MP 2.83
AMD A6-9120C SoC
A6-9120C SoC

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon MP 2.83 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate A6-9120C SoC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon MP 2.83 or A6-9120C SoC, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.