Ultra 9 185H vs Xeon Gold 6152

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6152
2017
22 cores / 44 threads, 140 Watt
16.07
Core Ultra 9 185H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 45 Watt
18.52
+15.2%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Xeon Gold 6152 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6152 and Core Ultra 9 185H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking421324
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.47no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldIntel Meteor Lake-H
Power efficiency10.8638.95
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,655$640

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6152 and Core Ultra 9 185H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4422
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.1 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache1.375 MB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache22 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache30.25 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Maximum core temperature92 °C110 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6152 and Core Ultra 9 185H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647Intel BGA 2049
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6152 and Core Ultra 9 185H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6152 and Core Ultra 9 185H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6152 and Core Ultra 9 185H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6152 and Core Ultra 9 185H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6152 and Core Ultra 9 185H.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes488

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6152 16.07
Ultra 9 185H 18.52
+15.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6152 25521
Ultra 9 185H 29416
+15.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.07 18.52
Recency 25 April 2017 14 December 2023
Physical cores 22 16
Threads 44 22
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 45 Watt

Xeon Gold 6152 has 37.5% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ultra 9 185H, on the other hand, has a 15.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 211.1% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 9 185H is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6152 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6152 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 185H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6152 and Core Ultra 9 185H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6152
Xeon Gold 6152
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Core Ultra 9 185H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 8 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6152 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 432 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 185H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6152 or Core Ultra 9 185H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.