Apple M1 Max vs Xeon Gold 6240

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6240
2019
18 cores / 36 threads, 150 Watt
15.28
+9.8%
Apple M1 Max
2021
10 cores / 10 threads
13.91

Xeon Gold 6240 outperforms Apple M1 Max by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6240 and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking458534
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.87no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldApple M-Series
Power efficiency9.64no data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)no data
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)18 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,445no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6240 and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads3610
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.22 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache1.125 MB2.9 MB
L2 cache18 MB28 MB
L3 cache24.75 MB48 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data57000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6240 and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647no data
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6240 and Apple M1 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6240 and Apple M1 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6240 and Apple M1 Max are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6240 and Apple M1 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933no data
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 Max 32-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6240 and Apple M1 Max.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6240 15.28
+9.8%
Apple M1 Max 13.91

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6240 24270
+9.8%
Apple M1 Max 22098

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.28 13.91
Recency 2 April 2019 18 October 2021
Physical cores 18 10
Threads 36 10
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

Xeon Gold 6240 has a 9.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 80% more physical cores and 260% more threads.

Apple M1 Max, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Gold 6240 and Apple M1 Max.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6240 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 Max is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6240 and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6240
Xeon Gold 6240
Apple M1 Max
M1 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 10 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 692 votes

Rate Apple M1 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6240 or Apple M1 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.