EPYC 7F52 vs Xeon E5-2690

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2690
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 135 Watt
6.13
EPYC 7F52
2020
16 cores / 32 threads, 240 Watt
26.01
+324%

EPYC 7F52 outperforms Xeon E5-2690 by a whopping 324% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2690 and EPYC 7F52 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1090190
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.925.71
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency4.2715.80
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)14 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$397$3,100

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7F52 has 46% better value for money than Xeon E5-2690.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2690 and EPYC 7F52 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache64 KB (per core)1 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size435 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,270 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2690 and EPYC 7F52 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA2011SP3
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2690 and EPYC 7F52. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2690 and EPYC 7F52 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2690 and EPYC 7F52 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2690 and EPYC 7F52. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size384 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2690 and EPYC 7F52.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2690 6.13
EPYC 7F52 26.01
+324%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2690 9741
EPYC 7F52 41322
+324%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2690 585
EPYC 7F52 1442
+146%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2690 3459
EPYC 7F52 10640
+208%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.13 26.01
Recency 6 March 2012 14 April 2020
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 240 Watt

Xeon E5-2690 has 77.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7F52, on the other hand, has a 324.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7F52 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2690 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2690 and EPYC 7F52, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2690
Xeon E5-2690
AMD EPYC 7F52
EPYC 7F52

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 613 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 9 votes

Rate EPYC 7F52 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2690 or EPYC 7F52, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.