Xeon X5450 vs E5-2690 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2690 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 135 Watt
12.66
+722%

E5-2690 v4 outperforms X5450 by a whopping 722% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon X5450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking5762055
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.900.32
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)no data
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 October 2007 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,090no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2690 v4 has 3619% better value for money than Xeon X5450.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon X5450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)no data
Threads28no data
Boost clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Bus support2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
L2 cache3.5 MBno data
L3 cache35 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nmno data
Die size306.18 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature89 °C63 °C
Number of transistors4700 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon X5450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon X5450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon X5450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon X5450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory size1,536 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon X5450.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2690 v4 12.66
+722%
Xeon X5450 1.54

E5-2690 v4 outperforms X5450 by 722% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2690 v4 19584
+720%
Xeon X5450 2389

E5-2690 v4 outperforms X5450 by 720% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

Xeon E5-2690 v4 1053
+176%
Xeon X5450 382

E5-2690 v4 outperforms X5450 by 176% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

Xeon E5-2690 v4 7569
+591%
Xeon X5450 1096

E5-2690 v4 outperforms X5450 by 591% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.66 1.54
Recency 20 June 2016 1 October 2007
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 120 Watt

Xeon E5-2690 v4 has a 722.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 8 years.

Xeon X5450, on the other hand, has 12.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2690 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5450 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon X5450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
Xeon E5-2690 v4
Intel Xeon X5450
Xeon X5450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 1466 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2690 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 299 votes

Rate Xeon X5450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2690 v4 or Xeon X5450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.