i7-12650H vs Xeon E5-2667 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2667 v4
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 135 Watt
8.66
Core i7-12650H
2022
10 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
14.14
+63.3%

Core i7-12650H outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v4 by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i7-12650H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking880517
Place by popularitynot in top-10081
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.53no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Alder Lake-P
Power efficiency6.0729.74
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Alder Lake-H (2022)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,057no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i7-12650H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier32no data
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache25 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size246.24 mm2217 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °C100 °C
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i7-12650H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011Intel BGA 1744
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i7-12650H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i7-12650H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i7-12650H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i7-12650H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) ( - 1400 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i7-12650H.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2667 v4 8.66
i7-12650H 14.14
+63.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2667 v4 13761
i7-12650H 22466
+63.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.66 14.14
Physical cores 8 10
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 45 Watt

i7-12650H has a 63.3% higher aggregate performance score, 25% more physical cores, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-12650H is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2667 v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2667 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-12650H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i7-12650H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
Xeon E5-2667 v4
Intel Core i7-12650H
Core i7-12650H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 1305 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2667 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1625 votes

Rate Core i7-12650H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2667 v4 or Core i7-12650H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.