Xeon E3-1270 v6 vs E5-2650 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2650 v4
2016
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
8.51
+51.4%
Xeon E3-1270 v6
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 72 Watt
5.62

Xeon E5-2650 v4 outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v6 by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E3-1270 v6 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8941147
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.605.59
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Xeon E3
Power efficiency7.637.35
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date16 March 2016 (8 years ago)28 March 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,166$328

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1270 v6 has 115% better value for money than Xeon E5-2650 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E3-1270 v6 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeQPIDMI 3.0
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier2238
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache30 MB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size306.18 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature80 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E3-1270 v6 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt72 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E3-1270 v6. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E3-1270 v6 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E3-1270 v6 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E3-1270 v6. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866
Maximum memory size1.5 TB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E3-1270 v6 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no dataN/A
Max resolution over eDPno dataN/A
Max resolution over DisplayPortno dataN/A
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E3-1270 v6 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataN/A
OpenGLno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E3-1270 v6.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2650 v4 8.51
+51.4%
Xeon E3-1270 v6 5.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2650 v4 13523
+51.4%
Xeon E3-1270 v6 8934

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2650 v4 554
Xeon E3-1270 v6 1414
+155%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2650 v4 2679
Xeon E3-1270 v6 4529
+69.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.51 5.62
Recency 16 March 2016 28 March 2017
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 8
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 72 Watt

Xeon E5-2650 v4 has a 51.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Xeon E3-1270 v6, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 45.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2650 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1270 v6 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E3-1270 v6, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
Xeon E5-2650 v4
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v6
Xeon E3-1270 v6

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1676 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 55 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1270 v6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2650 v4 or Xeon E3-1270 v6, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.