Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs E3-1270 v6

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1270 v6
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 72 Watt
5.62
Xeon E5-2699A v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads, 145 Watt
16.45
+193%

Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v6 by a whopping 193% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1270 v6 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1150404
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.482.32
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E3Intel Xeon E5
Power efficiency7.3910.74
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Broadwell-EP (2016)
Release date28 March 2017 (7 years ago)25 October 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$328$4,938

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1270 v6 has 136% better value for money than Xeon E5-2699A v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1270 v6 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)22 (Docosa-Core)
Threads844
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0QPI
Bus rate8 GT/s2 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplier3824
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB55 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data456.12 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1270 v6 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)72 Watt145 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1270 v6 and Xeon E5-2699A v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1270 v6 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
SGXYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1270 v6 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1270 v6 and Xeon E5-2699A v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size64 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1270 v6 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4N/Ano data
Max resolution over eDPN/Ano data
Max resolution over DisplayPortN/Ano data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1270 v6 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXN/Ano data
OpenGLN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1270 v6 and Xeon E5-2699A v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1640

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1270 v6 5.62
Xeon E5-2699A v4 16.45
+193%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1270 v6 8934
Xeon E5-2699A v4 26129
+192%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1270 v6 1414
+20.1%
Xeon E5-2699A v4 1177

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1270 v6 4529
Xeon E5-2699A v4 9546
+111%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.62 16.45
Recency 28 March 2017 25 October 2016
Physical cores 4 22
Threads 8 44
Power consumption (TDP) 72 Watt 145 Watt

Xeon E3-1270 v6 has an age advantage of 5 months, and 101.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2699A v4, on the other hand, has a 192.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 450% more physical cores and 450% more threads.

The Xeon E5-2699A v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1270 v6 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1270 v6 and Xeon E5-2699A v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1270 v6
Xeon E3-1270 v6
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
Xeon E5-2699A v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 55 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1270 v6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 53 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2699A v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1270 v6 or Xeon E5-2699A v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.