Atom N270 vs Xeon E5-2640

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 and Atom N270 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1425not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.71no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency3.95no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)DiamondVille (2008−2009)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$162$44

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 and Atom N270 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate7.2 GT/s533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size435 mm225.9638 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C90 °C
Number of transistors2,270 million47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 and Atom N270 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Atom N270. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 and Atom N270 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Atom N270 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Atom N270. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size384 GB8 GB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Atom N270.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2640 6294
+4528%
Atom N270 136

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2012 2 April 2008
Physical cores 6 1
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 2 Watt

Xeon E5-2640 has an age advantage of 3 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N270, on the other hand, has 4650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2640 and Atom N270. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2640 is a server/workstation processor while Atom N270 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 and Atom N270, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640
Xeon E5-2640
Intel Atom N270
Atom N270

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1094 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 225 votes

Rate Atom N270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 or Atom N270, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.