C-30 vs Xeon E5-2609

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2609 and C-30 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2001not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.73no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD C-Series
Power efficiency2.13no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Ontario (2011−2012)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$143no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2609 and C-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rate6.4 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache10240 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm40 nm
Die size294 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2609 and C-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2609 and C-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX40 nm, 1.24-1.35V
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2609 and C-30 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2609 and C-30 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2609 and C-30. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3 Single-channel
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.1 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6250

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2609 and C-30.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2609 2858
+1506%
C-30 178

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2012 4 January 2011
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 9 Watt

Xeon E5-2609 has an age advantage of 1 year, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

C-30, on the other hand, has 788.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2609 and C-30. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2609 is a server/workstation processor while C-30 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2609 and C-30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2609
Xeon E5-2609
AMD C-30
C-30

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 12 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2609 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 18 votes

Rate C-30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2609 or C-30, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.