Ryzen 9 3900X vs Xeon E3-1280

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1280
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.54
Ryzen 9 3900X
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
20.53
+480%

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon E3-1280 by a whopping 480% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1280 and Ryzen 9 3900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1531275
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.1321.73
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiency3.5215.53
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date3 April 2011 (13 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$450$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 3900X has 1823% better value for money than Xeon E3-1280.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1280 and Ryzen 9 3900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads824
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)64 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size216 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °C95 °C
Number of transistors1,160 million19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1280 and Ryzen 9 3900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA1155AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1280 and Ryzen 9 3900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDI-no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1280 and Ryzen 9 3900X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1280 and Ryzen 9 3900X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1280 and Ryzen 9 3900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Clear Video HD--
InTru 3D--

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1280 and Ryzen 9 3900X.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1280 3.54
Ryzen 9 3900X 20.53
+480%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1280 5623
Ryzen 9 3900X 32612
+480%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1280 654
Ryzen 9 3900X 1710
+161%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1280 2194
Ryzen 9 3900X 9939
+353%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.54 20.53
Recency 3 April 2011 7 July 2019
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 8 24
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon E3-1280 has 31.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 3900X, on the other hand, has a 479.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 3900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1280 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1280 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 3900X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1280 and Ryzen 9 3900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1280
Xeon E3-1280
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Ryzen 9 3900X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 56 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 5169 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1280 or Ryzen 9 3900X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.