Celeron 837 vs Xeon E3-1290 v2

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1290 v2 and Celeron 837 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1419not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.68no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency4.32no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$885no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1290 v2 and Celeron 837 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate5 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data18
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm2131 mm2
Number of transistors1,400 million504 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1290 v2 and Celeron 837 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1155no data
Power consumption (TDP)87 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1290 v2 and Celeron 837. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1290 v2 and Celeron 837 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1290 v2 and Celeron 837 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1290 v2 and Celeron 837. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1333
Maximum memory size32.77 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1290 v2 and Celeron 837.

PCIe version3.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 87 Watt 17 Watt

Xeon E3-1290 v2 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 837, on the other hand, has 411.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1290 v2 and Celeron 837. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1290 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 837 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1290 v2 and Celeron 837, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2
Xeon E3-1290 v2
Intel Celeron 837
Celeron 837

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 238 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1290 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 837 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1290 v2 or Celeron 837, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.