Athlon II X2 240 vs Turion II Ultra M600

Aggregate performance score

Turion II Ultra M600
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.58
Athlon II X2 240
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.66
+13.8%

Athlon II X2 240 outperforms Turion II Ultra M600 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion II Ultra M600 and Athlon II X2 240 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28062744
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.28
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Turion II Ultrano data
Power efficiency1.570.96
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)Regor (2009−2013)
Release date10 September 2009 (15 years ago)23 July 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$35

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Turion II Ultra M600 and Athlon II X2 240 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data117 mm2
Number of transistorsno data410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion II Ultra M600 and Athlon II X2 240 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket S1 (s1g3) 638-pinAM3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II Ultra M600 and Athlon II X2 240. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
PowerNow+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II Ultra M600 and Athlon II X2 240. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion II Ultra M600 and Athlon II X2 240.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion II Ultra M600 0.58
Athlon II X2 240 0.66
+13.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion II Ultra M600 923
Athlon II X2 240 1042
+12.9%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Turion II Ultra M600 292
Athlon II X2 240 296
+1.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Turion II Ultra M600 510
+0.8%
Athlon II X2 240 506

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.58 0.66
Recency 10 September 2009 23 July 2009
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Turion II Ultra M600 has an age advantage of 1 month, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

Athlon II X2 240, on the other hand, has a 13.8% higher aggregate performance score.

The Athlon II X2 240 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II Ultra M600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion II Ultra M600 is a notebook processor while Athlon II X2 240 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II Ultra M600 and Athlon II X2 240, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II Ultra M600
Turion II Ultra M600
AMD Athlon II X2 240
Athlon II X2 240

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 14 votes

Rate Turion II Ultra M600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 383 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion II Ultra M600 or Athlon II X2 240, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.