Celeron T3000 vs Turion II Neo K685

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion II Neo K685
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.43
Celeron T3000
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.43

Primary details

Comparing Turion II Neo K685 and Celeron T3000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29682967
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Turion II Neono data
Power efficiency2.711.16
Architecture codenameGeneva (2010)no data
Release date15 December 2010 (14 years ago)1 April 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion II Neo K685 and Celeron T3000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Bus rate3200 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cacheno data1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.25V

Compatibility

Information on Turion II Neo K685 and Celeron T3000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1g4PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II Neo K685 and Celeron T3000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualizationno data
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-

Security technologies

Turion II Neo K685 and Celeron T3000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II Neo K685 and Celeron T3000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II Neo K685 and Celeron T3000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion II Neo K685 0.43
Celeron T3000 0.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion II Neo K685 684
Celeron T3000 687
+0.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 December 2010 1 April 2009
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Turion II Neo K685 has an age advantage of 1 year, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Turion II Neo K685 and Celeron T3000.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II Neo K685 and Celeron T3000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II Neo K685
Turion II Neo K685
Intel Celeron T3000
Celeron T3000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Turion II Neo K685 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Celeron T3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion II Neo K685 or Celeron T3000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.