Athlon II P320 vs Turion II M520

Aggregate performance score

Turion II M520
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.56
+27.3%
Athlon II P320
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.44

Turion II M520 outperforms Athlon II P320 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion II M520 and Athlon II P320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28262944
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Turion IIAMD Athlon II
Power efficiency1.511.67
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date10 September 2009 (15 years ago)12 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion II M520 and Athlon II P320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz3200 MHz
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion II M520 and Athlon II P320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketSocket S1 (s1g3) 638-pinS1g4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II M520 and Athlon II P320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationSSE-3, SSE4A, 3DNow!, MMX, DEP, SVM
PowerNow+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion II M520 0.56
+27.3%
Athlon II P320 0.44

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion II M520 1955
+10.1%
Athlon II P320 1776

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Turion II M520 3754
+7.3%
Athlon II P320 3499

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion II M520 1839
+9.9%
Athlon II P320 1674

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Turion II M520 33.6
+8.5%
Athlon II P320 36.45

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Turion II M520 1
+12.5%
Athlon II P320 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.56 0.44
Recency 10 September 2009 12 May 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

Turion II M520 has a 27.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Athlon II P320, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 40% lower power consumption.

The Turion II M520 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II P320 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II M520 and Athlon II P320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II M520
Turion II M520
AMD Athlon II P320
Athlon II P320

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 91 vote

Rate Turion II M520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 75 votes

Rate Athlon II P320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion II M520 or Athlon II P320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.