Celeron M 925 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-64

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-64 and Celeron M 925 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2961not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion 64Intel Celeron M
Power efficiency1.19no data
Architecture codenameTrinidad (2006−2007)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date13 April 2007 (17 years ago)1 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$70

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 X2 TL-64 and Celeron M 925 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size147 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C105 °C
Number of transistors154 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-64 and Celeron M 925 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-64 and Celeron M 925. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions65 nm, 1.075no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 April 2007 1 January 2011
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm

Turion 64 X2 TL-64 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron M 925, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Turion 64 X2 TL-64 and Celeron M 925. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-64 and Celeron M 925, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64
Turion 64 X2 TL-64
Intel Celeron M 925
Celeron M 925

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 21 vote

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 X2 TL-64 or Celeron M 925, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.