EPYC 7252 vs Turion 64 MT-28
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7252 outperforms Turion 64 MT-28 by a whopping 7018% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion 64 MT-28 and EPYC 7252 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3332 | 672 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 10.61 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Turion 64 | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | 0.65 | 9.60 |
| Architecture codename | Lancaster (2005−2006) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| Release date | June 2005 (19 years ago) | 7 August 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $475 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 MT-28 and EPYC 7252 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 31 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Die size | 125 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 114 million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 MT-28 and EPYC 7252 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | 754 | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 MT-28 and EPYC 7252. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 MT-28 and EPYC 7252 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 MT-28 and EPYC 7252. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.763 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.17 | 12.10 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 120 Watt |
Turion 64 MT-28 has 380% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7252, on the other hand, has a 7017.6% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.
The EPYC 7252 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 MT-28 in performance tests.
Be aware that Turion 64 MT-28 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7252 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
