Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs Steam Deck OLED APU
Aggregate performance score
Steam Deck OLED APU outperforms Core 2 Quad Q8300 by a whopping 287% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Steam Deck OLED APU and Core 2 Quad Q8300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1288 | 2344 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) | no data |
Power efficiency | 29.09 | 1.19 |
Architecture codename | Van Gogh (Custom) (2023) | Yorkfield (2007−2009) |
Release date | 9 November 2023 (1 year ago) | November 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Steam Deck OLED APU and Core 2 Quad Q8300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 1333 MHz |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 6 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | no data | 2x 81 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 71 °C |
Number of transistors | no data | 456 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.3625V |
Compatibility
Information on Steam Deck OLED APU and Core 2 Quad Q8300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | no data | LGA775 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and Core 2 Quad Q8300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Steam Deck OLED APU and Core 2 Quad Q8300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and Core 2 Quad Q8300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 4.61 | 1.19 |
Threads | 8 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 6 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
Steam Deck OLED APU has a 287.4% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, a 650% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.
The Steam Deck OLED APU is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q8300 in performance tests.
Be aware that Steam Deck OLED APU is a notebook processor while Core 2 Quad Q8300 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Steam Deck OLED APU and Core 2 Quad Q8300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.