EPYC 9174F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 350 Watt
60.45
+72.4%
EPYC 9174F
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 320 Watt
35.06

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX outperforms EPYC 9174F by an impressive 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9174F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16105
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.396.72
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency16.2810.33
Architecture codenameStorm Peak (2023)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date19 October 2023 (1 year ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,899$3,850

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX has 69% better value for money than EPYC 9174F.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9174F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads6432
Base clock speed4 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.3 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplierno data41
L1 cache64 KB (per core)1 MB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size4x 71 mm28x 72 mm2
Number of transistors26,280 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9174F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketsTR5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9174F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9174F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9174F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9174F.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 60.45
+72.4%
EPYC 9174F 35.06

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 95664
+72.4%
EPYC 9174F 55485

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 60.45 35.06
Recency 19 October 2023 10 November 2022
Physical cores 32 16
Threads 64 32
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 320 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX has a 72.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

EPYC 9174F, on the other hand, has 9.4% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 9174F in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9174F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
AMD EPYC 9174F
EPYC 9174F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 18 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 9174F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX or EPYC 9174F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.